After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. From lie recognition tools examined at the line to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being applied to asylum applications. This article explores how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to find the way these systems and to go after their right for proper protection.
It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to view the programs of cover. It www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects just who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: even though they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
